Contact Us
    Contact Us

    Please use the contact form to send us an email - and receive a response within 12 hours.

    Emergency? Call 720-220-2277 (24/7)

    Map To Our Office
    Read Out Blog
    Case Evaluation
    Charged With A Crime?
    Miranda Warnings - When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado - Criminal Lawyer Series

    Miranda Warnings – When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado – Criminal Lawyer Series

    Miranda Warnings – When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado  – Criminal Lawyer Series

    by H. Michael Steinberg Colorado Drug Crimes Criminal Defense Lawyer

    Colorado Criminal Law On Miranda Warnings – When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado – The famous Miranda Rights decision is little understood both in Colorado and across the country. Miranda warnings must be given when:

    (1) the suspect has been arrested and

    (2) the suspect is going to be interrogated (questioned).

    If a suspect is NOT in custody when he or she gives a confession or otherwise makes incriminating statements, he or she need NOT be “Mirandized” and a waiver of the Miranda warnings need not be obtained.

    Questioning Is The Easy To Understand Prong

    Almost all questioning of a suspect other than identification is classified as interrogation.

    “Custody” Under Miranda

    Miranda v. Arizona – the Miranda decision protects a defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. It requires the police to provide an advisement before custodial interrogation can take place.

    A suspect is in custody for purposes of Miranda if:

    “under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would consider himself to be deprived of his freedom of action to the degree associated with a formal arrest.”

    Compare The Definition Of “Seizure” Under the Fourth Amendment

    “Under the Fourth Amendment a seizure occurs when “a reasonable person would not have felt ‘free to leave’ or otherwise terminate an encounter with law enforcement.”

    There are two kinds of “custody” under these two amendments. Custody for the purposes of the Miranda case is much narrower than what constitutes a “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment.

    Even though a person may be ‘seized’ under the Fourth Amendment, this does not necessarily mean that the suspect is ‘in custody’ for purposes of Miranda.”

    Custody Is Determined By A Series of Factors:

    In determining whether a defendant is in custody – trial courts in Colorado apply the following non-exclusive factors, no one is completely conclusive – they are all balanced in the analysis:

    (1) the time, place, and purpose of the encounter;

    (2) the persons present during the interrogation;

    (3) the words spoken by the officer to the defendant;

    (4) the officer’s tone of voice and general demeanor;

    (5) the length and mood of the interrogation;

    (6) whether any limitation of movement or other form of restraint was placed on the defendant during the interrogation;

    (7) the officer’s response to any questions asked by the defendant;

    (8) whether directions were given to the defendant during the interrogation; and

    (9) the defendant’s verbal or nonverbal response to such directions.

    The Objective “Reasonable Person” Standard

    The Miranda custody determination is based upon an objective reasonable person standard.

    This is an objective test – so the thoughts or views of the officers or the suspect himself are not irrelevant.

    What If The Police Order Me To Stay Put While They Investigate A Crime?

    If a person’s freedom is restrained by police at the scene of a crime by requiring the person to sit down – that kind of police officer’s direction to stay put does not always equal restraint on a defendant’s freedom of action to the degree associated with a formal arrest.

    A defendant is not necessarily “in custody” if, after officers pat the person down, check their identification, and ask them to remain still before questioning them. Even if a person is not free to leave – if they are not subject to physical restraint and they are questioned “in a neutral area” such as the curb in front of their home they may not be “in custody” for the purposes of Miranda.

    Summary Miranda Warnings – When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado  – Criminal Lawyer Series

    A person may not be “in custody” under Miranda until they are formally arrested. In a 2014 decision by the Colorado Supreme Court agreed, the Court found that a defendant was not in custody for the purposes of Miranda until he was formally arrested and read his Miranda rights.

    The standard for custody for Miranda purposes is different than the seizure standard under the Fourth Amendment.

    Miranda Warnings – When Are You Under Arrest And In Custody In Colorado  – Criminal Lawyer Series

    If you found any information I have provided on this web page article helpful please click my Plus+1 button below so that others may also find it.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR: H. Michael Steinberg – Email The Author at [email protected] – A Denver Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer – or call his office at 303-627-7777 during business hours – or call his cell if you cannot wait and need his immediate assistance – 720-220-2277.

    If you are charged with A Colorado crime or you have questions about [shoplifting or grand theft], please call our office. The Law Offices of H. Michael Steinberg, in Denver, Colorado, provide criminal defense clients with effective, efficient, intelligent and strong legal advocacy. We can educate you and help you navigate the stressful and complex legal process related to your criminal defense issue.

    Over 40 Years Specializing in Colorado Criminal Law>H. Michael Steinberg, is a Denver, Colorado criminal defense lawyer with over 40 years of day to day courtroom experience – specializing in Colorado Criminal Law along the Front Range. He will provide you with a free initial case consultation to evaluate your legal issues and to answer your questions with an honest assessment of your options. Remember, it costs NOTHING to discuss your case. Call now for an immediate free phone consultation.

    Helping Clients To Make Informed Decisions In the Defense of Colorado Criminal Cases.

    Contact A Lawyer with Three Decades of Experience as a Denver Criminal Attorney at The Steinberg Colorado Criminal Defense Law Firm today.

    Colorado Defense Lawyer H. Michael Steinberg provides solid criminal defense for clients throughout the Front Range of Colorado – including the City and County courts of Adams County, Arapahoe County, City and County of Boulder, City and County of Broomfield, City and County of Denver, Douglas County, El Paso County – Colorado Springs, Gilpin County, Jefferson County, Larimer County, and Weld County,…. and all the other cities and counties of Colorado along the I-25 Corridor… on cases involving …

    Other Articles of Interest:

    If you found the information provided on this webpage to be helpful, please click my Plus+1 button so that others may also find it.

    H. Michael Steinberg Esq.
    Attorney and Counselor at Law
    The Colorado Criminal Defense Law Firm of H. Michael Steinberg
    A Denver, Colorado Lawyer Focused Exclusively On
    Colorado Criminal Law For Over 40 Years.
    The Edward Building
    8400 East Prentice Ave, Penthouse 1500
    Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111
    E-Mail:  [email protected]
    Primary Web Site:
    Colorado Criminal Law Blog:
    Main:  303.627.7777
    Cell:  720.220.2277
    24/7 Pager:  303.543.4433
    FAX (Toll Free):  1.877.533.6276
    Always investigate a lawyer's qualifications and experience before making a
    decision to retain that lawyer or, for that matter, any professional any field.